Is There Instant Replay in Baseball?
American Major League Baseball (MLB) started using instant replay in August of 2008 to review specific types of calls. Before that, instant replay in baseball had only been used on an irregular basis, usually by individual referees who had doubts about their decision. As of 2008, instant replay can be used to verify three types of calls: whether home run balls were fair or foul, whether the a home run ball actually went out of the ball field or not, and whether or not a spectator interfered with the progress of a ball hit in a home run. These are all known as "boundary calls" since they have to do with whether a hit is considered a home run or not.
As of 2008, instant replay can be used in three specific situations to determine if a hit can be considered a home run:
- To determine if the ball is fair or foul: if the ball is fair, the home run stands, if it is foul, then it doesn't count.
- To determine if the ball actually left the playing field or not. There are three possible outcomes here: if the ball clears the wall, it can be a home run; if it stays in the field it can be considered "live" and is still in play; and if it leaves the field entirely it can be considered a home run.
- To determine if a spectator interfered with a live ball by touching it or getting in the way of a player trying to catch it. This is only counted as interference if the ball is still in the field; once it passes over the wall spectators can try to catch it even if they get in the way of a player.
Instant replay had been used on a sporadic basis since the 1960s, when baseball Commissioner Bowie Kuhn reviewed video of a controversial call in the 1969 World Series. It was used on and off again until 1999, when referees were actually reprimanded by the American League Office for looking at footage of a ball that hit the scoreboard in a game between the Florida Marlins and the St. Louis Cardinals. The Marlins protested, saying that watching the footage set a bad precedent, and the use of instant replay in baseball was banned until the MLB officially sanctioned it in 2008. It was officially used for the first time in the World Series the next year when Yankees player Alex Rodriguez hit a ball that hit a camera.
Whether or not to allow the use of instant replay in baseball was a controversial issue for many years, with some arguing that instant replay in baseball would ruin the historical aspect of the game and take decision-making capabilities away from the umpires. In addition, purists argued that the human error facet of the game — an
’s ability to blow a call — is part of the charm of the game, one that sets it apart from other professional sports. Proponents of instant replay in baseball said that it is the only way to ensure objectivity and ensure that the proper call gets made every time. While conceding that instant replay in baseball must be limited to only certain aspects of the game — for instance, arguing balls and strikes would still be considered off limits — those in favor of instant replay have taken the stance that it would better the game by ensuring blown calls do not influence the outcome of a game or series.
As of 2010, instant replay in baseball had been used over 120 times, with about 50 of the uses resulting in an overturned call. New developments are expected to take place in 2012, when referees will be able to use instant replay to determine whether a ball that was caught was fair or foul, or whether a spectator sitting behind any wall facing the field interfered with the ball, whether or not it involves a boundary call.
Sporkasia - What you say sounds good, but what happens when we get to the point where every play is being reviewed? Are fans expected to spend 12 hours watching a baseball game. That may be an exaggeration, but the games will get longer.
I think the answer is creating the best umpire school possible and then putting the calls in the hands and in front of the eyes of the people trained and paid to do the job. Let the umpires do their jobs. The fans will let them know when they make bad calls.
Drentel, I am a baseball traditionalist, and even I see that instant replay has its merits. What's wrong with taking a few extra minutes to get a call correct. I'd rather have the umpires get the call right--even if it costs my team a victory.
I agree that baseball umpire training has improved, but they are human and they miss calls. Let's help them get it right with a second and third and fourth look when needed.
Animandel - That's a good question. From my point of view, the game does not need instant replay. Umpire training has improved over the years, and umpires are now graded. Sure they still make mistakes and get the call wrong, but even instant replay is not perfect.
Instant replay just slows down the game, and it was already slow enough.
I am torn: Is instant replay good for baseball? Or, is it going to ruin America's pastime?
Post your comments